Dear Editor: While so many readers want to weigh in on their opinions as to the persona of our current president, I would hope that those who make a choice for a candidate based on their perception on one’s morality, would check out the questionable lifestyle of at least six presidents that have served in my lifetime and separate their morality issues from their presidential performance.   

Dear Editor: Our President has been called many things in his three years in office, but my adjective of choice is “frustrating.” He seems to be, morally, on both sides of what is right and proper.

Dear Editor: I am struck by the contrast between the front page article on President Trump’s address to the March for Life and the column by Edith Avila Olea (“What Is the Value Of Life,” Feb. 1).

Dear Editor: The article written by Edith Avila Olea (“What Is the Value Of Life,” Feb. 1) was well written, and she states all the worries about the cost of pre-natal care, giving birth, the lack of paid parental leave, the cost of child care and that life isn’t a simple act of birth — it costs money.

Dear Editor: I hope you don’t think that President Trump is pro-life. At the moment, he is indeed  anti-abortion, but certainly not pro-life.

Dear Editor: Very disturbing to see the headlines on the front page of The Tablet that Iowa Democrats are so united in defeating the only true pro-life president. 

Dear Editor: A number of people asked me about Mr. White’s article about the Iowa caucuses about to begin. I indicated that I had not read it and curiosity edged me to read the article. I read the Tablet every week.

Dear Editor: Two sisters in the congregation of the Humility of Mary are staunch supporters of anyone but Trump (“Iowa Catholics Weigh Choices,” Jan. 25). Sister Elaine closed with, “I’ve gone all the way around the circle and I don’t know where I am right now.” She is surely in the “wrong circle.”