National News

Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Rule on Birth-Control Coverage

Judge Haywood Gilliam, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Photo Wiki Commons)

On Sunday, federal Judge Haywood Gilliam blocked a Trump administration’s rule that would allow more employers to decline providing women with no-cost birth control on moral or religious grounds. The Department of Health and Human Services issued the new rules that were supposed to go into effect on today. The ruling by Judge Gilliam, from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, put the new policy on hold for 13 states and the District of Columbia.

President Obama’s Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare) requires most companies to offer their employees health insurance that covers birth control at no cost. The new rule was consistent with President Trump’s promise to protect the religious freedom of employers by making it easier to opt out of the ACA requirement.

Pro-life groups and religious organizations had asked the Trump administration to allow for more flexible exemptions to Obamacare’s birth control mandate. The request is consistent with their opposition to birth control, sterilization and specially birth control methods considered abortifacients because they can prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus.

Judge Gilliam had said at a previous hearing that the changes introduced by the Trump administration would result in a substantial number of women losing birth control coverage.

The decision in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California was issued Sunday in response to a lawsuit filed by California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia.

The plaintiffs had requested Judge Gilliam to block the new rule nationwide, but the judge limited the scope of the ruling to the 13 states and Washington D.C.

2 thoughts on “Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Rule on Birth-Control Coverage

  1. From 2016 to 2018 there was a Republican majority in both houses and a Republican president. Why was this a rule change rather than a change in law? Once again the Republican party is playing pro lifers like a bad fiddle.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *