National News

Bishops Support Biden’s Racial Equity Orders Related to Housing, Prisons

A jail cell is seen in 2010 at the federal penitentiary in Huntsville, Texas. Under an executive order issued by President Joe Biden Jan. 26, 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice will not renew contracts with private prisons. (Photo: CNS/Jenevieve Robbins, Texas Dept of Criminal Justice handout via Reuters)

WASHINGTON (CNS) — The chairmen of two U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ committees welcomed recent executive actions by President Joe Biden to address racial equity in housing and the use of private prisons by the federal government.

The orders will reduce discrimination in federal policies, Archbishop Paul S. Coakley of Oklahoma City, head of the Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, and Bishop Shelton J. Fabre of Houma-Thibodaux, Louisiana, head of the Ad Hoc Committee Against Racism, said in a Feb. 1 statement.

One order directs the Department of Housing and Urban Development to review the Trump administration’s repeal of the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule, a plan to tackle housing discrimination and segregation. Put in place by President Barack Obama’s administration, the rule required cities and towns to examine their housing patterns for racial bias, report the findings and set goals for addressing segregation.

The second order directs the Department of Justice to phase out the use of private prisons, which hold about 14,000 of the 2 million people incarcerated in the U.S.

“To decrease incarceration levels, we must reduce profit-based incentives to incarcerate by phasing out the federal government’s reliance on privately operated criminal detention facilities,” Biden’s order said.

The bishops said repealing the Trump administration’s rule on housing “is a step in the right direction to restoring needed protections against housing discrimination.”

The Trump rule minimized the responsibility of the federal government to promote fair housing, their statement said. “The federal government has a critical role to play in overcoming and redressing our nation’s history of discrimination, and we hope the administration follows through on the important work of promoting fair housing and human dignity,” they said.

Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson announced July 23, 2020, his agency was replacing the Obama-era regulation with a new fair housing rule called “Preserving Community and Neighborhood Choice.”

He said at the time the 2015 rule “proved to be complicated, costly and ineffective” and forced communities “to comply with complicated regulations that require hundreds of pages of reporting.”

Civil rights advocates made the repeal of the Trump administration rule a priority during the presidential election campaign.

Regarding private prisons, the bishops said the USCCB has “long questioned the efficacy of private companies running prisons, and this step is a positive development in criminal justice reform.”

“We encourage the administration to consider similar policies in the future regarding civil immigrant detention facilities,” they added.

2 thoughts on “Bishops Support Biden’s Racial Equity Orders Related to Housing, Prisons

  1. The USCCB’S support of Biden’s position on equity with respect to housing and prisons is certainly praiseworthy.On the other hand they should extended commentary on their view of equity,as Biden proposes,to be pursued across all branches of government.Language and words matter and to extricate words uncritically from the context in which they were intended opens up a plethora of opportunities for distortions and misuse.All those who maintain this was the case with the 14th ammendment being used to turn “equal protection under the law” into some new fuzzy and new absolute right to abortion are well aware of the slippery slope of “word substitution”.It is nowhere maintained in the Declaration of Independence or our Constitution that “equity” is the right of all men but rather “equality” is.While equity was widely used as a principle in jurispudence,it was not used in our documents to define fundamental rights.So let’s be careful of this encroaching new trend of “word exchange and substitution”,words that sound alike and resemble one another can have profound differences of nuance and meaning when it comes to the foundational principles of our Anerican Republic.