The Book of Genesis explains God created the universe by his word alone, speaking the world into existence. As we read in the first chapter of Genesis, “God said, ‘Let there be …’ ” And as God reflected on the six days of creation, He looked upon his work and “found it very good.” 

The Gospel of St. John further explains that the word through and by which the Father created the world is Christ himself. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came to be through him, and without him nothing came to be” (Jn 1:1- 3a). The Greek word St. John uses is “logos,” which can be translated as “reason” as well as “word.” By using the word “logos” to explain that the Father created the world by and through the Word, St. John is telling us that the universe is rational and true. Jesus, the eternal Logos through which the world was created, is “the way, the truth, and the life” (Jn 14:6). 

I thought about these aspects as I recently re-read George Orwell’s “1984.” It could be argued Orwell’s fictional predictions of a dystopian future have never been more relevant, especially his depictions of “Newspeak” and “Doublethink,” both of which are becoming the lingua franca of American political and public life. 

With the proliferation of “deep fakes,” AI, ideological falsehoods, and prevaricating politicians, we do well to revisit the novel and take lessons about the necessity of truth-telling and honest communication to sustain rational communities. 

For example, “Newspeak” in the novel is a spot-on description of how abortion advocates disguise the unjust killing of unborn human beings by referring to “reproductive justice.” It also accounts for the mutilation of organs and sterilization of children as “gender-affirming care.” The purpose of “Newspeak,” Orwell explains, is “to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper” to Ingsoc, the ruling political ideology. When Newspeak is adopted to obfuscate reality, “Oldspeak” — that is, truthfulness — “should be literally unthinkable, at least as far as thought is dependent on words.” 

To exert control over all aspects of society, the party replaced truthful words with false ones and exerted absolute control over their definitions. “This was done … by the invention of new words” and “by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of undesirable meanings.” In other words, Newspeak destroys authentic, rational human community by replacing truth with falsehood and imposing it by force. 

Closely related to this destruction of truthful speech is Ingsoc’s notion of “Doublethink”: “to know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies.” Doublethink “is to hold simultaneously two opinions … knowing them to be contradictory and believing both of them … to repudiate morality while laying claim to it.” 

What better way to describe an ideology, for example, that declares men can become pregnant, and women can be outfitted with a man’s reproductive organs? Or simultaneously, to profess that gender is both a “social construct” and an “innate” sense of identity? To declare sexual physiology is irrelevant to gender, but to insist on amputating sexual organs to conform to gender identity? Doublethink is quickly becoming the prevailing dogma. 

Seventy-five years after its publication, and 40 years after its historical setting, “1984” has never been more accurate in its description of the increasing dystopia of American public life. Nor has the novel ever been more relevant as a cautionary tale about the danger of exchanging truth for lies. 

Kenneth Craycraft, an associate professor of moral theology at Mount St. Mary’s Seminary and School of Theology in Cincinnati, is the guest author of this column.